Wednesday, May 19, 2010

George Abariotis - Shipping, Fishing and the Environment (THURS)

Shipping and fishing are two of the world’s most ancient and lucrative industries. It brings people and commodities together from the corners of the world fostering communication, trade, and even economic booms. These industries are globally established with ports in every continent and sea routes crisscrossing the map. However, their adverse environmental effects are vast. The World Wildlife Fund identifies a few ways ways in which shipping pollutes and degrades the environment: oil spills from shipwrecks, the release of bilge oil (oil and water from the ships holds) as well as other chemicals needed for the maintenance of ships, introduction of invasive species carried by ballast water (seawater carried by a ship in order to maintain a certain weight when it’s not carrying cargo). However, the impact of fishing on the environment is by far larger. Over fishing, bycatch, and destructive yet profitable fishing practices such as bottom trawling and the use of explosives have destroyed marine habitats and rendered some species such as the North Atlantic Cod nearly extinct. The ocean which provides oxygen, food, and jobs is exploited for the sake of profit in an unsustainable way. However, these industries must continue to exist because of their beneficial qualities. This paper will examine what different schools of thought (such as Utilitarianism, Social Contract Theory, Biocentrism etc .) recommend for dealing with this issue and how they relate to the goals and policies of organizations such as Greenpeace, the International Maritime Organization, and WWF.

13 comments:

  1. How would each of the three worldviews view fishing practices and the purpose/value of them?

    ReplyDelete
  2. How does Utilitarianism, mainly Cost-Benefit analysis play a role in fishing practices?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Jacqueline JohnsonMay 19, 2010 at 3:46 PM

    What are the ethical arguments on the opposing side? If fishing practices ceased, or at least, slowed greatly, wouldn't that lead to issues as well? So, what are the appropriate measures to take?

    ReplyDelete
  4. How has the government regulated fishing practices? Do you believe it should do more?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Could technology be limited? How would the environment and economy change if say only sail boats could be use or more primitive fishing methods?

    ReplyDelete
  6. In relation to species such as salmon, are practices such as farm-raising fish more humane? More sustainable? It has been argued that fish raised in a farm accumulate more toxins, probably from what they are fed.

    Could farm-raising fish be a viable solution to cut back on over fishing?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Is this an argument against the fishing practice as a whole or just as it currently stands? If explosives were no longer used, pollution was drastically reduced, and policies implemented to insure the conservation of species, would this practice still be morally wrong? What implications does this have on the argument regarding animals' intrinsic, or lack there of, value? If an animal has intrinsic value, is ANY use of it morally wrong? It would be interesting to see how each of the three approaches would resolve this conflict.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The ocean is a commons. What are the ethical implications of depleting and ruining this commons versus doing the same to a private area?

    If the neoclassical theory about usage of the commons is true (that everyone will take only what they need & things will balance out), then why is this still a problem?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Do you think that privatization of fishing rights in certain waters could help solve this issue? Furthermore what steps should be taken in order to make fishing more sustainable?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Are there good reasons as to why fishermen are increasing their catch? In what ways can they release the pressure that population growth are exerting on the fishing industry?

    ReplyDelete
  11. overfishing has a big effect on the oceans, what would be a solution based off the precautionary principle?

    ReplyDelete
  12. What kind of arguments could be made under the biocentric view to save species that have not been affected by human kind? Is the biocentric view enough to be made into international laws? And how would those laws be enforced?

    ReplyDelete
  13. What would be an argument against these fishing practices from the viewpoint of the Land Ethic? Also, how does the tragedy of the commons apply to this issue?

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.